In this blog, I intend
to research how bank regulation developed in the United Kingdom in recent
decade (2004-2013), which is a period for banks experienced enormous finance successes
and fails. Besides discussion for specific laws and regulations, I will research
the replacement of regulators.
Before I explore those
sections, I would like to get flavors about why regulates banks, what the bank
regulation is and who the regulars are.
Varied
views argued about reasons why regulates banks based on distinct focuses such as nature of banking assets, type of banks
(Free banks needn't be regulated.), characteristics of banking industry etc. The inherent instability and systemic risks
of
banks, seen as key points, would lead to the necessary of bank regulations. So
actually, what is bank regulation? It is defined as ‘a form of government regulation which subject banks to certain requirements, restrictions and guidelines’.
Others identify it as ‘the formulation and issuance by authorized agencies of specific rules or regulators, under governing law, for the conduct and structure of banking’.
Banking
industry is regulated and runs business particularly lending activities without
discretion, monitoring and examining under laws and principles, namely, Basel
II, Basel III and Banking Act 2009. As an important role, bank regulation
creates a transparent circumstance among banking activities, monetary
institutions and other entities, like regulators—Central Bank and Independent
Regulator. In the UK, Bank of England (BoE) did not conduct the regulation after
late 1990s and the independent regulator—Financial Systematic Authority (FSA)—have
replaced by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority
(PRA) in 2013.

No comments:
Post a Comment